RoderickE is a proven author of many genres. If you want someone to bring your thoughts alive and put them onto the page, RoderickE is the ghostwriter for you!
LIST OF PUBLISHED BOOKS
WHAT TO EXPECT
Unlike many ghostwriters that spend months and even years bringing your book to the market, RoderickE wants a quick turnaround time for your story. His advice and strategy for your book is to create a short first book, like an introduction book. In the 21st century, unfortunately the attention span of readers is much shorter. Only really dedicated readers consume large books and those readers have favorite, famous authors. These readers are unlikely to read your book, so the time, effort, and funding you put into it will more than likely be wasted.

RoderickE is honest with you and doesn't simply want to take your money on an unending project. Rather, RoderickE wants to see you experience the book writing emotion that happens the moment you see your name on the cover a completed book! Let RoderickE help you realize that dream! He wants the process to be a less than 3 month endeavor. The book he wants to produce for you is 95-150 pages in a 6x9 inch beauty, along with the ebook version and potentially even an audiobook version. Are you interested in that?

RATES
In 2023, REEDSYBlog released an average pricelist which is only for the base job of writing a book. There are typically a lot of hidden costs with other ghostwriters. But don't worry, RoderickE wants to give you an upfront price and these prices aren't anywhere near what those other ghostwriters charge. (source: https://blog.reedsy.com/cost-to-hire-a-ghostwriter )

Using the base $12,000 for 75,000 words, this comes to $0.16 cents a word. Since RoderickE will limit his Ghostwriting services to a 20,000 word (95-150 page) book, you will expect the final costs for writing the book to be about $3,200-$3,500 just for the writing of the book. For the full package, of writing, cover art, uploading, and publishing to Amazon as paperback and ebook, you're looking at about $4,000-$5,000 total. For audiobook, using AI narration adds another $500-$1,000. Are you interested?

CONTACT AND GET STARTED!

As some readers might know, I was adopted at age 4. For 50 years, I casually searched for my birth family but in June 2018 my state changed the law so that adoptees could submit forms that would grant identifying information if either the birth parents agree or if they were deceased. I did so and by November 2nd I received my original birth certificate with my biological mother's name. Ironically, I was adopted on November 2nd 1972. Within days I had located my "half" birth siblings. Again, both biological parents were deceased. The biological father died on my birthday in 2017. I was a year too late. Stupid humans telling other humans what they can and cannot know and do. Anyhow...

America's independence day is not just another country's independence from some colonial "mother country". America was not some subordinate fiefdom that had been passed around from king-to-king throughout time. The American Experiment was a time and place where and of people who wanted to be free; free from the centuries long dictatorships of monarchical oversight.
The American Revolution was always inevitable because here is a place where all the "rebels" and individualists of the world would come to get away from the dictators and fascists, and mob-ruling elitists of the world.

The latest "crisis" that Democrats and the media are using to distract from the fact that the FBI, the U.S. media, and the DNC were colluding to "stop" Donald Trump from becoming president is that poor asylum seeking children at the U.S. southern border are being separated from their loving parents that are committing a crime by entering the U.S. illegally. Democrats (and some stupid Republicans) are demanding Trump fix this multi-presidential-administration policy immediately. They don't want to use the legal process of having the Congress craft legislation.

I've written a speech I believe would change everything about how Trump is presented by the media and how even Democrats view him. It is my hope that someone close to him or someone influential will get him to read this and consider giving a similar speech in the coming days:

During every party change of the American presidency, the losing party seems so distraught as unable to go on, but with Donald Trump's election a new manifestation of grief from leftists seems to be showing. They seem unable to come to terms that not only did he win, but he is doing exactly what he said he'd do.

Before you vote for Hillary Clinton or Gary Johnson, or Jill Stein, or Evan McMullin or anyone including Donald Trump you should really consider what is happening? In Trump you have for the first time in YOUR LIFE, a person who isn't giving you a bunch of political bullsh@t. He scares the media and the politicians of both parties because he isn't playing by their game rules. He is telling the truth and speaking directly to YOU, the American. Forget about what political party you think you're supposed to vote for. Trump is neither a Democrat or a Republican. Trump is the candidate you've been waiting for. The candidate that is for his fellow Americans BEFORE any political party. You owe it to YOURSELF to stop for a moment and listen to this 45 minute speech that puts it all into perspective.

"If [the government elites of both parties] can fight someone like me who has unlimited resources to fight back, just look at what they can do to you. Your jobs, your security, your education, your health care, the violation of religious liberty, the theft of your second amendment, the loss of your factories, your homes, and much more." -- Donald Trump

As you listen to or read the presentation, think about what it would mean for your life, or your children, or your grandchildren if these policies were enacted? Please don't fall for voting for the "first" XYZ for president. This is not a homecoming king or queen contest. This is our future we're voting for. THANKS.

Full disclosure; I'm a Donald Trump supporter...even before it was Ted Cruz approved. I've always tried to be fair and objective about any topic. The reason Hillary won the first presidential debate against Trump is because Trump would not go after major points he let slide. Further, Lester Holt asked some gotcha questions like the last one about whether Hillary "looked presidential". Looks isn't simply about physical appearance but about overall presentation. Hillary, like Obama presents a weak and apologetic image; a "lead from behind" or wait for consensus before action. But the main places that Trump failed is not hammering Hillary on Benghazi. As far as I recall he never mentioned it. He certainly could have used it when Hillary claimed she wants to be a president that allies and people can trust and count on. Letting our servicemen die in Libya is not a good example of that.


While Trump did bring up the 33,000 deleted emails, he should have again used it when pressed about his tax records. He could have said, "my tax records at least are still available and will eventually be released and have not been deleted, since you are talking about hiding things Mrs. Clinton. What were you hiding?". I'm not saying Trump lost the debate but by playing it cool, he let her overshadow him. Even her toothy, smug, dismissive, elitist grin wasn't enough to bury her. She was able to make it look like she could at least take on Trump. He went softly against her...and even said so. I imagine he won't next time.


How many people will now support Hillary after this first debate? Will they so easily forget she helped rig the primary? Will they so easily forget that she is an habitual liar; whether about fake sniper fire or emails or health issues? Do they even care? Has Trump lost any supporters? We will see.

How do you judge between the Republican and Democratic Presidential Conventions? By what standards? Is it how many times the crowd breaks out in chants of "USA! USA! USA!" Is it based on how many zingers are brought against the opposing party's candidate? I will watch both conventions minute by minute and give a review and comparison of each. While it may be difficult to use crowd response as a measure, since we expect the supporters to hoop and cheer for their choice; if the crowd is clearly subdued compared to the opposite party convention, we can use it. But I suspect aspects that will be obvious are things like; pro-American statements, citation of actual experience that will assist the next president, citation of actual policies that will be put forward in the next administration, and general classiness.

If I were elected president, on day one I'd call a news conference and with all the cameras rolling, I'd personally scrub the Oval Office down with Lysol. And then say,

As I interact on forums and social media, I've had a few people accuse me of espousing the views of the TEA Party. What is ironic is that
I have never really looked into the views of the TEA Party except to know that the T.E.A. stands for "taxed enough already". It is curious that
anyone wouldn't agree with that sentiment. I have also never been to a TEA Party event. Don't get me wrong, I may have a lot in common with
the TEA Party, but if so it is just a coincidence in that both the TEA Party and I could be concluding the same common principles of core

When I first began building content about my campaign, friends and supporters wondered why I didn't do more. I told them it is kind of silly to run a race with no competitors. At the time of October 5, 2014 when I announced my intent, there were no real challengers. So for me to do more than formulate my platform would have been futile.
It is now April 12, 2015. The 2016 Presidential Election Race has begun. We now have multiple declared Republican Candidates in Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton officially announced today. The field is being set.

I've moved on to a game called Ark Survival Evolved

Barack Obama was not elected as America's first post-racial or first black president. Obama is America's first revenge president. He was elected by both black and white Americans in hopes of dishing out payback for America's past of racial inequalities and prejudices. Many who elected Obama wanted him to get back at America. They wanted him to take from those who supposedly had been oppressing them and give it to the oppressed. They wanted him to "redistribute the wealth" and redistribute everything else they think was being withheld from them. To this end, Obama has been working ever since his election in 2008.

THE REAL FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT

Some day America will have its real first black president; or rather its first president that happens to be black. This president will not spend years trying to divide people while using false platitudes of making people "pay their fair share" but rather this real first black president will use his or her time in that honorable yet humbling office to highlight that before any American is any pigment of skin or any hyphenated group, every one of us is part of this one great nation. This first black president will not spend time trying to exact revenge (wink, wink) on certain classes or colors of Americans, but rather will spend time highlighting the fact that America really is the land of opportunity.

As you know, America is a country of immigrants...but LEGAL immigrants. Ellis Island in New York processed over 12 million immigrants in its 62 years of operation. Research indicates 40 percent of Americans can trace a relative arriving through Ellis Island. (source#1, source#2) The point is, as would be expected from a nation that values law, there are laws and processes that govern how a person can enter the United States. (Summarized position)

Sometimes politicians become so full of themselves that they don't see any reason why you SHOULDN'T vote for them.

In August of 2014 a black 18 year old man named Mike Brown was shot and killed by Ferguson Missouri police officer, Darren Wilson. This event sparked riots and looting by locals and perhaps by others entering the area. A short time after the hostilities, the police released video that purports to show Brown stealing $50.00 in cigars from a liquor store and pushing and threatening the store clerk. While even police admit that Wilson did not know at the time Brown was a suspect in the robbery, the video could show that the media narrative of Brown being merely a shy, "gentle giant" that was gunned down merely for being black, is a false narrative. Brown was shot after being confronted by Wilson for supposedly walking in the middle of the street which was disrupting traffic. There is a claim by the police officials that Brown resisted and physically abused Wilson. All of this is lost on the "protesters" who simply think this is "white cop racism and brutality".


Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King jr. made some comments while on the The Steve Malzberg Show.

When my daughter was younger and was asking all kinds of questions about what other denominations believed, I got the idea to take a "church tour". What we did was visit various denominations in chronological order of their founding. We did this not to see which one we wanted to join or which one we liked best, but rather simply to understand the transition of denominations. As a matter of fact, some questions that were supposed to be in our minds as we visited these various denominations were:

1. What makes this denomination distinct from other denominations?
2. What commonalities does this denomination have with others?
3. What practices/emphases with this denomination should be part of other denominations?

In this way, it is less about what we "like" and more about understanding why the denomination exists in the first place. Of course, the most important thing is whether the denomination adheres to the Bible or not but if we spent the entire service critiquing this aspect we could miss the point. We certainly spent time as a family afterward analyzing the denomination's doctrines.

Perhaps as you are reading this, you are thinking that the mere fact there are so many denominations points to the sheer failure of Christianity to be a cohesive Faith. Or maybe you are thinking why bother understanding all the different major denominations. Why not just be a "Christian" and go to a non-denominational church.

Well, first God understood there would be denominations or "factions" and that these factions serve a purpose as it says in 1 Corinthians 11:18-19 --

"For first of all, when you come together as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you, and in part I believe it. For there must also be factions among you, that those who are approved may be recognized among you."

Secondly, there really is no such thing as a "non-denominational" church since every congregation has its specific doctrinal emphasis. Some may emphasize baptism by immersion whereas others may simply sprinkle or pour the water over the initiate. This is just one example of distinctions that may be seen even in so-called non-denominational congregations. In fact, as soon as a group of Christians begin to gather together, there will be distinctions that cause them to want to study and worship together. This will essentially define their "faction".

As Barack Obama's presidency comes to an end, let us consider what has happened and what will happen. First, why is it that liberals think they own the realm of civil rights? In truth, the first civil rights act was passed in 1866 and was OPPOSED by Democrats. See the PBS documentary on it here. In fact, the Democrats so opposed it that the Democrat president, Andrew Johnson vetoed it, and the Republican Congress had to overturn his veto. The 1866 Civil Rights Act in short 'granted citizenship and the same rights enjoyed by white citizens to all male persons in the United States "without distinction of race or color, or previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude."' It was the Democrats who then imposed the so-called Jim-Crow laws on black-Americans -- making them use separate bathrooms and such.

And also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in case anyone thinks the Republicans of 1866 were different than the Republicans of today -- the vote on the original bill was counted as follows with yeas on the left and nays on the right side.

• Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
• Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

And even on the final version of the bill, we see that the majority support for Civil Rights came from the Republicans.

• Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
• Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)