politics

We vs Me

CollectivismIn We vs Me, multi-genre author Roderick Edwards delivers a provocative, unfiltered exploration of the eternal human tension between collectivism and individualism. Across history, cultures, and emerging technologies, Edwards traces how societies oscillate between the pull of the "we"—tribes, states, political parties, and ideological collectives that demand conformity and group preservation—and the defiant "me," the individual's drive for autonomy, innovation, and personal agency. What begins as a straightforward examination of tribal origins and state formation evolves into a deeper critique of how these forces shape everything from ancient myths and religious worldviews to modern political agendas and the rise of artificial intelligence.
Edwards challenges conventional narratives with blunt honesty, arguing that tribal mentalities—rooted in insularity and recursive groupthink—often hinder societal advancement, while unchecked collectivism imposes subtle (or overt) tyranny in the name of fairness and equity. Drawing on diverse examples—from the Bible and Bhagavad Gita to Native American reservations, Amish Rumspringa, and the historical records of political parties—he dissects the "us vs. them" psychology that fuels division, while warning against superficial divisions like race in favor of focusing on ideas, behaviors, and scalable systems. The book unflinchingly addresses controversial topics, including biases in media, education, and AI platforms that compress complex realities into controlled narratives, often at the expense of truth.
As the discussion widens, Edwards reframes the conflict not as a zero-sum battle but as a necessary symbiosis: the collective provides structure and cognitive shortcuts for navigating complexity, while the individual supplies intuition, disruption, and uniqueness that prevent stagnation. Speculative sections on AI's future—from biased guardrails to potential superintelligence—raise urgent questions about human agency in an era where information control and algorithmic mediation could redefine existence itself. Yet the core message remains pragmatic and empowering: true freedom lies in maintaining mental independence amid inevitable systems, calibrating the balance between "we" and "me" according to what proves most positive for the most people over the longest time.
Written in Edwards' signature conversational yet recursive style—zooming in on sharp observations before pulling back to reveal larger patterns—We vs Me is both a philosophical manifesto and a call to cognitive resilience. Whether you're navigating personal identity, political disillusionment, or the accelerating impact of technology, this book invites readers to question manipulated narratives, reject conformity for its own sake, and reclaim the unique "me" that no collective can fully absorb. For those unafraid of uncomfortable truths and ready to think beyond echo chambers, We vs Me offers a raw, outsider's lens on what it truly means to be human in a world of competing "wes."
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
PAPERBACK: https://amazon.com/dp/B0GR16Q255?tag=roderickedotc-20
HARDCOVER: https://amazon.com/dp/B0GR1FRCPJ?tag=roderickedotc-20
EBOOK: https://amazon.com/dp/B0GQZGBLBJ?tag=roderickedotc-20
AUDIOBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GPZQZQMM?tag=roderickedotc-20

Updating The Constitution

In an era where political factions increasingly call for drastic changes to the U.S. Constitution, author Roderick Edwards offers a bold and unflinching analysis in his newest book, Updating the Constitution. This thought-provoking work explores who truly has the moral and historical authority to amend America’s foundational document—and why reckless changes may lead to unintended consequences.
With sharp historical insight and unapologetic clarity, Edwards defends the Constitution as an enduring framework built not merely by "old white men" but by visionaries who, despite their flaws, articulated a universal truth: natural rights apply to all people. The book contrasts the deliberate amendment process with the emotional and sometimes destructive impulses that have historically driven reform efforts. From the Articles of Confederation to modern controversies over same-sex marriage and voting age, Updating the Constitution forces readers to ask: Are we building a better union—or dismantling it?

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
PAPERBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FLV5DKF6?tag=roderickedotc-20
HARDBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FLTYPFZ4?tag=roderickedotc-20
EBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FLF1L3NF?tag=roderickedotc-20
AUDIOBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FPRP8MSK?tag=roderickedotc-20






Brown vs White (The Book)

BrownFrom the author of books like HOW TO OVERTHROW A GOVERNMENT, THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF BLACK PEOPLE, and THE OTHER WHITE PEOPLE: From Vikings to Russians comes the discussion of the century, BROWN VS WHITE talks about all the things we should have talked about there moment the Democratic Party lost the Civil War. The moment Abraham Lincoln was shot. The moment the 1866 Civil Rights Act was passed. Brown vs White is the book for anyone serious about discussing racial issues, justice issues, equality and equity issues.

Brown vs White is a provocative, unflinching examination of humanity’s oldest and most explosive fault line: the struggle between cultures, technologies, tribes, and the stories we tell about ourselves. Roderick Edwards—an adoptee whose outsider vantage point frees him from inherited loyalties and fashionable narratives—delivers a sweeping, uncomfortable, deeply researched interrogation of racism, history, and identity that refuses to play by the rules of modern discourse.

Across chapters that move from ancient Africa to Viking Scandinavia, from Arab slave routes to American politics, Edwards dismantles the simplistic black‑and‑white framing of racial conflict. Instead, he exposes the deeper engine behind human domination: technological disparity, tribal instinct, and the retelling of history by whoever holds the pen. As the book states, “Enslavement in some sense is thus, self‑imposed.”

Drawing on forgotten histories—African tribes selling other Africans, Native American warfare before European arrival, Arab slave markets dwarfing the Atlantic trade—Edwards challenges the reader to confront realities long buried under modern political narratives. As the book bluntly observes, “Black African history is not being retold by white Europeans; it simply does not exist in any substantial sustained form.”

But Brown vs White is not merely historical. It is a diagnosis of the present:

  • the rise of POC identity as a political tool,
  • the weaponization of “white guilt,”
  • the emergence of LGBTQ activism as a new “protected class,”
  • the cultural erasure of whiteness through media revisionism,
  • and the growing fracture between collectivist and individualist worldviews.

Edwards argues that modern racial conflict is no longer about skin color at all—it is about power, narrative, and the ideological machinery that pits groups against each other for political gain. He warns that forced integration, forced diversity, and forced ideological conformity are creating a brittle society primed for backlash, resentment, and possibly civil conflict.

Yet the book ends not in despair but in challenge. Edwards calls readers back to the founding idea of America: a nation of individuals, not tribes. A nation where identity is earned, not assigned. A nation where solutions require honesty, not slogans.

Brown vs White is not a comfortable book. It is not a polite book. It is a necessary book—one that demands readers step out from under the rock of inherited narratives and confront the full, unfiltered complexity of human history and human behavior.



PAPERBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D5BLMCKX
HARDBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D59T3WH1
EBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D4B4B97D
AUDIOBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CYRLLH83

Cheating was Plan B

Trump was never supposed to win in 2016. The political class certainly didn't believe he had a chance. Just look how all the elites reacted when he was thinking about running.

More Than Trump

Trump"MORE THAN TRUMP explores the phenomenal support and following of Donald Trump and how that following existed before him and will continue after him. Trump is merely the lightning rod for the ideas and policies of Americans that want to maintain a lifestyle outlined in the founding documents.


With all the books available on Donald Trump, what makes the book MORE THAN TRUMP different? More Than Trump was written by multi-genre author, Roderick Edwards known for his detailed research of topics as varied as biographies of World War 2 soldiers, or the man that developed USA’s satellite program, or more specialized topics like the history of sedition in his book How to Overthrow a Government. Roderick Edwards brings his no-nonsense style and 21st century media methods to this unique approach to the life of Trump as the book was written in real-time as many of the events unfolded. More than Trump, as the title indicates is about more than Trump. It is about why and how Trump became president and what MAGA really means to people.



PAPERBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CFCY7FW2
HARDBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CFCZF49X
EBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CBXT3VTC
AUDIOBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CFX2MKHH
SNEAK PEEK of the audiobook, Chapter 12

How to Overthrow a Government

Sedition

With the world seemingly on the cusp of revolution; with ideologies clashing more than ever, with protests and riots everywhere now is the time to consider why and how governments are overthrown. This book not only will help the reader understand but even consider what happens after.
The coming years promise to be full of conflict due to the divergent worldviews of globalism, nationalism, individualism and outright anarchy all vying for dominance in the minds of the people. Add to this volatile situation, social media and mass media propaganda and you have the perfect mix to start revolutions not just in one nation but in the entire world. This could usher in a world-wide revolution, not just another world war. This time, it would be the people against the elites. Not a class war but a war for common sense to prevail.


READ THE BOOK TODAY:
PAPERBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B084DH8BMH
HARDBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B092H5QBM7
EBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0839QYG9Z
AUDIOBOOK: https://www.audible.com/pd/B08DK2QLBT

PODCAST INTERVIEW ON THE SCREAMING CHUY SHOW:
Screaming Chuy Podcast
BOOK RODERICK FOR INTERVIEWS/SPEAKING

RNC vs DNC Conventions 2016

Convention Review

How do you judge between the Republican and Democratic Presidential Conventions? By what standards? Is it how many times the crowd breaks out in chants of "USA! USA! USA!" Is it based on how many zingers are brought against the opposing party's candidate? I will watch both conventions minute by minute and give a review and comparison of each. While it may be difficult to use crowd response as a measure, since we expect the supporters to hoop and cheer for their choice; if the crowd is clearly subdued compared to the opposite party convention, we can use it. But I suspect aspects that will be obvious are things like; pro-American statements, citation of actual experience that will assist the next president, citation of actual policies that will be put forward in the next administration, and general classiness.

Just Stuff

BOOK IDEA
Shhh, I'm working on a book that is so controversial that I dare not even utter the name of it online, via text, and not even during a phone conversation. Truly, this book is more "taboo" than the most socially taboo topic you could think of. I hope to have it complete and published before the winter of 2014. I hope it is not too late. This link gives a hint at the topic: http://rodericke.com/edge-of-anarchy
RSS FEEDS
Next, I have been adding interesting feeds to RoderickE.com's R-Feeds link. The latest one is Upworthy. I'm not certain what to think of the content. While most of Upworthy's stuff is ideologically..."liberal", it is nonetheless interesting. Take a look: http://rodericke.com/aggregator/sources/52
PODCAST
Yes, the Roderick At Random podcast languishes. I'm sorry. I just have little time to devote to it. Maybe in the winter when I'm forced inside during Indiana's hibernation period. See here: http://rodericke.com/forums/r-podcast
EXCEL CONSULTATION
I've been working a bit on the side as an Excel/spreadsheet consultant; making VBA projects that help improve accuracy and efficiency. See here: http://rodericke.com/excel

What About the Next Black President?

As Barack Obama's presidency comes to an end, let us consider what has happened and what will happen. First, why is it that liberals think they own the realm of civil rights? In truth, the first civil rights act was passed in 1866 and was OPPOSED by Democrats. See the PBS documentary on it here. In fact, the Democrats so opposed it that the Democrat president, Andrew Johnson vetoed it, and the Republican Congress had to overturn his veto. The 1866 Civil Rights Act in short 'granted citizenship and the same rights enjoyed by white citizens to all male persons in the United States "without distinction of race or color, or previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude."' It was the Democrats who then imposed the so-called Jim-Crow laws on black-Americans -- making them use separate bathrooms and such.

And also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in case anyone thinks the Republicans of 1866 were different than the Republicans of today -- the vote on the original bill was counted as follows with yeas on the left and nays on the right side.

  • Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
  • Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

And even on the final version of the bill, we see that the majority support for Civil Rights came from the Republicans.

  • Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
  • Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
tag: 
Subscribe to RSS - politics
Lutro Agent