How To Leave Preterism

Leaving preterism isn’t just a doctrinal shift—it’s a psychological and spiritual reawakening.

In this bold and unflinching guide, Roderick Edwards—once a committed full preterist for over 15 years—walks readers through the tangled reasoning and emotional dependence that traps people in this fringe eschatology. With decades of firsthand experience, Edwards helps readers understand why preterism appeals, why it fails, and how to move beyond it.

This is not another academic proof-text exchange. This is a lifeline for anyone trying to escape or help someone else break free from the theological echo chamber of preterism.

Whether you’re ready to leave, skeptical of this book, or helping someone else recover their faith, you’ll find practical insights, historical perspective, and raw honesty.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
PAPERBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FHHYZB1G?tag=roderickedotc-20
HARDBACK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FHHFVPHP?tag=roderickedotc-20
EBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FHBSWTW3?tag=roderickedotc-20
AUDIOBOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FLG2HBHF?tag=roderickedotc-20






SNEAK PEEK of the audiobook, Chapter 6

1 Hour video interview on the book:

I have published an article on Acedemia.edu and because of your experience in Preterism, I would like your honest opinion. I have included the abstract for this below. I can send you the PDF (no need to join Academia.edu). Let me know if this is something you are interested in. Abstract This article examines preterism not primarily as a disagreement over eschatological chronology, but as a system-level interpretive framework governed by a controlling logical constraint and sustained through systematic redefinition. It argues that preterism is driven by a false dilemma concerning prophetic credibility—namely, that New Testament eschatological prophecy must be exhaustively fulfilled within the first century or else Jesus and the apostolic witnesses were mistaken. Once this dilemma is accepted, exhaustive first-century fulfillment becomes non-negotiable, and interpretive flexibility is redirected away from chronology and toward the meaning, referent, and verification of prophetic language. Through representative case studies (Romans 8; Revelation 1:7; Olivet Discourse material), the article demonstrates how key eschatological concepts—resurrection, parousia, judgment, and fulfillment itself—are redefined in order to preserve first-century fulfillment claims. Particular attention is given to the collapse of fulfillment criteria, whereby correspondence between prophecy and historical event is no longer required. The study shows that this process results in a model of fulfillment that cannot, even in principle, be falsified by historical non-occurrence. The central conclusion is that preterism functions as a non-falsifiable eschatological system, not because it denies fulfillment, but because it redefines fulfillment in such a way that failure cannot be identified. While the article does not reject symbolic interpretation, typology, or inaugurated fulfillment, it argues that biblical prophecy presupposes stable referents and publicly identifiable outcomes. A model that insulates fulfillment claims from disconfirmation departs from the biblical logic of prophetic verification itself.

You have identified the reason I often call preterism (especially full preterism) theological liberalism akin to political liberalism. Both redefine terms and present false narratives when arguing their points. For example, preterists often interchangeably use the words/phrases "return", "resurrection", and "come back" while ignoring that in Mt 26:64 Jesus comes TO the Father/Ancient of Days, as a verification and vindication that he is the Christ/Messiah he claimed to be. It was not a return to Earth. Anyhow, your paper looks like it zeros in on this problem that a discussion with preterists is flawed by their redefinitions. Let me know how it goes. Thanks for sharing.

Add new comment

COMMENT POLICY rodericke.com philosophy of transparency, honesty, and liberty allows for guests to make comments without registration or login. Note all comments will be moderated but most legitimate comments will be published even if critical. -- Thanks for commenting - RECENT COMMENTS
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Lutro Agent